Accounts payable teams have one mission: make sure suppliers get paid accurately and on time, without overpaying, duplicating payments, or introducing unnecessary risk. But in practice, that’s easier said than done.
Between manual processes, miscommunications across departments, and a constant flow of invoices, it’s easy for errors to slip through. That’s where 2-way, 3-way, and 4-way matching come in. These simple yet powerful processes are among the most effective internal controls accounting teams can use to ensure accuracy and prevent financial leakage.
And when you pair matching with automation? You get a streamlined, audit-ready AP process that actually works for you.
Let’s walk through how each type of matching works and why making them easier with automation is a smart move.
Here’s a common scenario. Your team places an order for 500 ergonomic office chairs at $120 each. A few days later, an invoice lands in your inbox, but it lists 550 chairs at $135 each.
Without checks in place, that overpayment could easily fly under the radar. But with 2-way matching, the invoice is automatically compared to the original purchase order. Any pricing or quantity discrepancies trigger a flag.
Here’s what this simple check does, and why it matters:
2-way matching works well for simple, recurring purchases. But it doesn’t always account for what was actually delivered.
Let’s say you ordered 1,000 feet of steel tubing. The PO and invoice match, but your receiving team logs only 800 feet. Whether it was short-shipped or delayed, the mismatch could cause problems if AP isn’t looped in.
3-way matching fills that gap by introducing the receiving report. It verifies not just what was ordered and billed, but what was physically received.
Here’s how it connects ordering, billing, and delivery:
Industry reports show that 39% of invoices contain errors. Many of those errors stem from delivery discrepancies that 3-way matching helps prevent.
Now imagine the shipment arrives in full, but when it’s inspected, 20% of the materials don’t meet your quality standards.
If you’re only relying on the PO and receiving slip, AP might approve the full payment without knowing that part of the shipment was rejected.
That’s why some teams take it a step further with 4-way matching. It includes a final step: verification that what was received was also accepted by your quality or compliance team.
Here’s how it helps ensure you're paying for quality:
Even when these controls exist, manual matching is a bottleneck. Teams chase paper trails, approvals stall in inboxes, and disconnected systems make it hard to verify anything in real time.
According to Ardent Partners, only 32.4% of invoices are processed straight-through without human intervention. More than 20% are flagged as exceptions.
The average invoice takes 14.6 days to process. That timeline hurts cash flow and slows the month-end close.
That’s where Smart Capture comes in. It combines AI-powered document capture with Human-in-the-Loop validation. Invoices, POs, and receiving slips are automatically matched based on your rules.
You no longer need to dig through files or cross-check spreadsheets. Instead, the system captures and matches line-item data in real time, flagging exceptions and routing them to the right person with full context.
Here’s what automated matching looks like in action:
Teams that implement Smart Capture with 3-way matching and exception routing often see significant time savings, reducing invoice intake time by as much as 70%.
Matching doesn’t just keep your process efficient. It helps protect against payment fraud too.
In 2024, 79% of organizations reported payment fraud attempts, and nearly 60% of companies experienced losses over $5 million.
Here’s how matching strengthens your fraud defenses:
The stronger your match, the lower your risk.
When matching becomes part of your AP workflow, not an afterthought, it unlocks meaningful benefits.
Here’s what teams unlock when matching is built into the process:
Strong matching controls help you automate approvals with accuracy and confidence. But automation doesn’t stop there.
How you pay matters just as much as what you pay. Traditional methods like paper checks can slow you down, introduce unnecessary costs, and increase your risk, even if your invoice process is airtight.
Explore how modern AP teams are rethinking payments to complete the automation picture:
Traditional vs. Virtual Payments: Why Modern AP Teams Are Making the Switch